Polygraph tests, more commonly known as lie detector tests, have been
placed in a category of pseudoscience although some still think they have a
scientific basis. In 1988, the US government passed the Employee
Polygraph Protection Act, which banned the use of the polygraph testing for pre-employment purposes. The test consists of two main parts; the subject is first asked a few
"control questions" followed by questions that have to do with the
purpose of the test. The control questions are set in place to create emotional discomfort.
The biggest issue with these tests are how they are
measured. The test has a physiological recorder that measures blood
pressure/heart rate, respiration and skin conductivity. The use of these
measurements makes an invalid assumption that there is a standard correlation
between the physiological changes and deception. A nervous person may be
innocent but afraid to answer the questions while a guilty person could be
non-anxious. Another issue with lie detector tests stems from how the amount of
physiological change leads to deception. Does it have to be an overwhelming
difference or a slight difference? Polygraph tests have been proven to get
guilty people to confess but there is a 50:50 chance that is will falsely identify an honest person as guilty.
http://www.science20.com/gerhard_adam/pseudoscience_lie_detectors-93551
http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/lie-detector-tests-tell-truth-29637.html
No comments:
Post a Comment